"Roll"-in With The Homies...

Sean's Top List of Why He Loves The End Of The Year/Start Of The New Year

-It's (kinda) winter, which means layering, which means multiple outfit options.

-In those outfits, I get to break out my $8 Target flannel button-ups.

-Being able to put 30 pounds of blankets, plus my heated mattress pad on high when I dream sweet dreams. 

-The smell of cinnamon for some reason intensifies and just smells like magic and hope.

But one of my favorite things around this time of the year are all the lists of "Top ____ of 20__" that everyone comes out with. They're like mini scrapbooks about extremely specific subjects that make you look back and say, "Ah, 2011, remember when the baby names Emma and Mason were just SOOOOOOO hot?"

As I was looking though these lists, I found one that really caught my eye and I needed to share. The Advertising Standards Bureau listed the 10 most complained ads in Australia in 2011. Below are some print ads in the list, along with how many complaints they received. Let's take a look, shall we?

I mean...wow. There it is people, the most complained about ad in Australia isn't a woman in front of the word "Sex" with some strategically placed duct tape, and it's not three women eager to use their tools in a ménage à trois (or would it be a foursome? Is the person reading the ad included? Oh, the mysteries in life). Nope, by a landslide, the most complained ad is of two men, fully clothed, hugging, and one is holding a condom cause protection is the bees knees.

Now, I remember my Aussie mate Matthew telling me about this "Rip and Roll" ad a while back, and it just shocked me that people were so offended by it. Apparently, it was the whole uproar was started by The Australian Christian Lobby (surprise, surprise) and all 45 bus posters were taken down by Adshel, the company that owns the ad spaces. Check out the video below (note: this was before the complaints were dismissed and ads were put back up):

I mean, how is this offensive? If anything, it's an extremely positive ad promoting safe sex. This is just a perfect example of how some people can be so ignorant and go right for the "TWO GAY GUYS AHHHHHHHHHHH!" complaint, vs seeing the ad for what it's promoting. But the fact that the number of complaints the print version has is almost three times...yes...THREE TIMES the about of complaints the second most complained ad has, now that's just utterly ridiculous. 

But "halleloo" for the Advertising Standards Bureau, who dismissed the complaints and released this statement:

"The Advertising Standards Board dismissed complaints about the ad as it was strongly in favour of the important health message the advertisement portrays... It considered that while some members of the community would prefer not to see this issue advertised, the public health message overrides any social sensitivity." 

Ridiculous...absurd...but good for the Advertising Standards Bureau for sticking to their guns and seeing the ad as a positive message. Once again, let's hope that people will be able to get past their "Gay people are bad" filter and accept that we're here...and not going anywhere.

And that's the end of that.  Now if you excuse me, I have cinnamon candle fumes to enjoy... 

Lipstick?...Check. Hair?...Check. Controversy?...Double Check.

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

Did everyone have a great holiday? Eat your body weight in sugar cookies? Find that random special someone at 11:59pm to kiss? 

For the new year, why not start off with a little commercial controversy, shall we? Totes. 

The following ad below is getting quite a bit of talk and controversy for the subject matter...take a look below:

Hmmmmmmmm...

So the ad is from New Zealand tampon company Libra depicting a woman and a drag queen character (I'm obsessed with her eye-glitter) giving each other some "I look better than you" looks while applying cosmetics and adjusting the bosoms. But at the end, the biological woman pulls out her tampons, "winning" the battle do to the indication that she is capable of menstruating, and the drag queen leaves in a huff. End with the tagline, "Libra Gets Girls." 

See how this is a tad bit offensive? If not, let me walk you through it...

Ever since its December 21st premiere, people in NZ and around the world have been in an uproar about this ad. Many have gone to social media, stating they're boycotting the product because of this ad. To get an idea of the complaints, The New Zealand Herald spoke with Agender NZ president Cherise Witehira about her reactions and the reactions of many others in the transgender community. Calling the ad "blatantly transphobic" she goes on saying, "It's extremely offensive because it's pretty much saying the only way you can be a woman is to get your period. That's where a lot of the anger in the community is coming from - it's saying you are not a woman unless you can get your period. Obviously we can't menstruate. However, we identify as female." They also claim that the ad clumps transgender women and drag queens as one (which is fo sho not the case) and reinforces the thought that transgender people are "not normal."

After the enormous amount of complaints, Libra came out with a statement today on their Facebook page responding to the commercial:

"Libra regrets any offence taken to our recent tampon advertisement. It was never intended to upset or offend anyone.

Independent research was undertaken and the advertisement was viewed positively during that testing.

Libra takes all feedback very seriously, and in response to this, we will immediately review our future position with this campaign based on the feedback received. There are no further advertisements scheduled in New Zealand.

The advertisement has not aired in Australia. The advertisement was placed on Facebook however this has also been removed."

As nice as it is that Libra came out with this statement and has pulled the ads from

Facebook and TV, Queerty pointed out that the video is still up on the home page of the company website...aaaaand there goes that apology.

Even the star of the commercial Sandee Crack (God I love drag queen names) posted on her Facebook wall for a petition to keep the ad on the air. That petition (at time of post) has received 191 signatures, the one to take it off has received 1,712.

When I first saw the ad this morning, my first reaction was just, "Ugh, really?" I read some comments on the Facebook page that included things like, "Lighten up!" or "Come on people, it's 2012! Laugh a little!" Yeah, it's 2012, I'm not going to "lighten up" about the fact that people are still using the LGBT community as the butt of the jokes in advertising. It amazes me that companies make these ads and not one person through the whole process says, "Umm, don't you think this might offend a few people?" Yes, controversy will get people talking (aka Benetton), but when it is putting down an entire group of people and openly using them for a laugh, that's when the line should be drawn. I also have to agree with Cherise about the ad clumping drag queens and transgender people into one. I've personally known lot of people that assume most drag queens want to become women, or label transgender MTF as drag queens, not knowing they are two completely different things entirely. But with the subject matter of this commercial and the drag queen's reaction, I think this ad only promotes the stereotype of them being one category, which is unfair to both. And the tagline, oh the tagline. "Libra Gets Girls." Cherise said it's "saying you are not a woman unless you can get your period," and I think that sums up how I feel about this ad. If that tagline was just in a typical tampon commercial, fine, great tagline...but with the subject matter at hand, it really does twist the message a little, making me feel just a little uneasy. 

There seem to be a lot of people that see this as funny, and if you do, fine. We have a different sense of humor. But I think if more people understand who it's offending and their reasons, perhaps they might see it in a different light... 

UPDATE: The spot is finally now off Libra's homepage. Took a bit longer than it should have, but at least it's now off...